If you've ever walked through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.
They are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still cause problems for people.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. what is a safe distance from a cell tower for exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy can be harmful to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis and cataracts, and skin cancer.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that a safe range from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the farther the tower is.
Although Check out this site may sound like an ideal idea, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers might be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers had much more health problems than those who were distance from them.
This study revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, used for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is vital to be aware of this because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ in the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effect of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.